See here.
Transportation
May 16, 2011
Loss of rail between Milwaukee and Chicago?
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Transportation1 Comment
May 6, 2011
“Obama administration floats draft plan to tax cars by the mile”
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Books, Climate Change, Energy, Environment, TransportationLeave a Comment
December 9, 2010
WI Gov.-Elect Walker “Derails Economic Development and Jobs with Opposition to Rail”
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Politics, Transportation1 Comment
I earlier posted about the loss of high-speed rail funds in Ohio and Wisconsin to other states. (At least the funds are still going to rail rather than roads.) This post’s title quote is the title this press release from Milwaukee County Clerk Joseph Czarnezki criticizing Wisconsin’s Governor-elect for stopping high-speed rail in Wisconsin. (It seems I agree a lot more with my father as an adult than I suspect I did as a child.) The money quote in the press release:
“Governor-Elect Walker has kicked Wisconsin taxpayers in the caboose by sending our hard earned tax dollars to other states.”
UPDATE: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has a long article detailing the redistribution of the rail funds. (At least some of the money is coming to Vermont…I vote for high speed rail from Montpelier to NYC, or any rail from Vermont to Boston.)
UPDATE 2: Train-maker to pull out of Milwaukee.
December 9, 2010
Feds to pull WI and OH High Speed Rail Money
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Politics, Transportation1 Comment
Mere moments ago, I posted about the absurd railroad politics in Wisconsin and Ohio. Now this: “Sources say feds to pull, redistribute state’s high-speed rail money.” The money quote:
“Congressional sources say the Obama administration is taking $1.2 billion in high-speed rail money away from Ohio and Wisconsin and awarding it to projects in other states. People familiar with the grants say the Department of Transportation will announce Thursday that California, Illinois and New York, among other states, will get a share of the funds. Republican governors opposed to high-speed rail were elected in Ohio and Wisconsin in November. They have promised to kill projects in their states.”
That’s right folks, the states will now have to pay back the feds, will lose high-speed rail infrastructure, and will lose the jobs created by construction, maintenance, and ridership, and might lose the manufacturing jobs for making the trains.
December 9, 2010
December 4, 2010
Wisconsin’s silly train politics continues…
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Politics, Transportation1 Comment
Even though the state’s operating expenses will be relatively low, the Governor-elect still wants to kill the project. See here.
November 17, 2010
Wisconsin high-speed rail cash could go to elsewhere
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Transportation1 Comment
I’ve written before about the high speed rail saga in WI. Now this: LaHood says Wisconsin high-speed rail cash could go to N.C., elsewhere.
November 11, 2010
The train politics in WI continues: “Talgo might move plant to Illinois if Walker kills train project”
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Politics, Transportation1 Comment
I’ve been posting a lot lately about the high-speed rail saga in Wisconsin. See here. Well, now this: Talgo, the train maker, might move the train-making plant to Illinois if WI Gov.-elect Walker kills the train project.
November 8, 2010
More on the WI High Speed Rail Saga
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Energy, Environment, Transportation1 Comment
Three days ago, I wrote:
For many years, no trains. Then progress and trains. I was happy. Then they wanted to stop the trains. I was annoyed. Then no trains. I was in disbelief.
Now trains AND no trains. Now, I’m just confused. The Governor-elect of Wisconsin is against high speed train service, but wants the train maker to keep making trains in Wisconsin for said train service. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
Now this: Canceling rail line will cost $100 million, cut 400 jobs.
This is all getting very silly. The state will receive $810 in federal money to create high-speed rail, and the state only has to pay the $7.5 million a year operating costs. And “federal aid could cover as much as 90% of that amount, as it does with Amtrak’s existing Milwaukee-to-Chicago Hiawatha line.” Given the job creation, the cost to stop the rail line compared to the operating costs, and the need for alternatives to motor vehicles, this project should proceed. That said, most of the $100 million is already sunk, and I’m unclear as to what the state has already paid for or might have to reimburse the federal government for.
UPDATE: Despite GOP hopes to keep the $ in WI if not used for rail, there is “little hope for using train money for roads.”
UPDATE 2: In this Greenwire article (subscription required), the Obama Administration makes clear the money will go to other states if not used for high speed rail, and NY has already requested the money.
November 5, 2010
The Wisconsin Train Saga Continues…Happiness, Annoyance, Disbelief, and now Confusion
Posted by Jason J. Czarnezki under Politics, Transportation, Uncategorized[3] Comments
For many years, no trains. Then progress and trains. I was happy. Then they wanted to stop the trains. I was annoyed. Then no trains. I was in disbelief.
Now trains AND no trains. Now, I’m just confused. The Governor-elect of Wisconsin is against high speed train service, but wants the train maker to keep making trains in Wisconsin for said train service. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.