Environment


According to this NY Times article, China is dominating the production of green technologies like wind turbines and solar panels for a number of reasons: cheap labor, much needed government support, and violation of  WTO and IMF rules.  The question is whether we should care that the Chinese method in unfair to foreign countries if it is resulting in more affordable green technologies.  Certainly, I have concerns about working conditions and social justice (and the loss of American jobs),  but the Chinese government is much more willing to (and can more easily) invest in green projects in the solar and wind industry and high-speed rail.  Is the problem really Chinese violation of international agreements, or the unwillingness of the U.S. government/Congress/business to promote and require green technologies and forward-thinking infrastructure?

Various environmental groups filed a Petition requesting that the EPA ban lead shot, bullets, and fishing sinkers under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).  On August 27th, in this Letter, EPA denied the portion of the Petition related to lead shot because the EPA argues it lacks authority to regulate lead shot and bullets due to the exemption in TSCA sec. 3(2)(b)(v), which exempts “any article the sale of which is subject to the tax imposed by section 4181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.”  That section of the tax code refers to pistols, revolvers, firearms, shells and cartridges.  Other items are also exempt from TSCA when they are the subject of other federal statutory jurisdiction like the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.  However, the EPA may still regulate fishing tackle and are taking comment on this issue.  See here and here.

Vermont Law School seeks an individual to join our dynamic and committed faculty, and to serve as the Faculty Director of the Vermont Law School U.S.-China Partnership for Environmental Law.

The Faculty Director will divide his or her time between traditional faculty roles of teaching and scholarship, and the additional role of Faculty Director of the VLS U.S.-China Partnership, a thriving program of U.S.-China environmental law faculty and student exchange, policy assistance, and capacity creation.  The faculty responsibilities include teaching at approximately half load and producing related scholarship.  The U.S.-China Partnership Faculty Directorship involves working with the Program Director to determine directions for the Partnership, establish and maintain relationships with funders and with Chinese partners in government, academia and the non-profit sector.

The Partnership trains Chinese attorneys, judges and scholars in environmental law, brings Chinese environmental law professors and students to Vermont, sends Vermont Law students and faculty to China, and produces collaborations and scholarship among its participants.  The current program personnel include Siu Tip Lam, the Program Director.  Ms. Lam is a former Massachusetts state assistant attorney general in the environmental field with capability in Mandarin and Cantonese.  The program staff includes three other individuals, Chinese nationals with environmental law advanced degrees or training.  As Program Director, Ms. Lam is responsible for developing and implementing the program activities and managing the existing grants and funders.  The Faculty Director will focus on teaching in both Vermont and China and on generating related scholarship, as well as developing relationships with Chinese academics and potential funders of the U.S.-China Partnership.  He/she will work with Ms. Lam and the current staff to further develop the VLS curriculum on Chinese law, build relationships with potential funders, and determine the future direction of the program, including the formulation of strategic partnerships leading to a potential on-the-ground presence in China.

Duties and Responsibilities

Primary responsibilities associated with this position include:

  • Teach two classes most years (including a core course, U.S. and/or Chinese environmental law courses or international law course).
  • Research and produce academic publications.
  • Represent the U.S.-China Partnership in the development of relationships with Chinese academics and potential funders.
  • Develop strategic partnerships to explore possibility of building an on-the-ground presence in China.
  • Help guide and supervise research by students and/or scholars.

Education, Skills and Experience

This position requires significant experience with environmental issues as well as the desire and temperament to be a good mentor for the development of new professionals in the field.  Successful candidates should possess a record of professional productivity such as academic publications and the following qualifications:

  • JD degree
  • Knowledge of Chinese and American law
  • Knowledge of broad environmental and energy law issues in China and the U.S.
  • Knowledge of international law
  • Proficiency in Mandarin Chinese and/or Cantonese highly preferred
  • Achievement in research, writing, or scholarship
  • Some fundraising experience
  • Excellent interpersonal, verbal communication and writing skills, as well as the ability to develop effective multi-agency/institutional relationships
  • Interest and willingness to regularly travel to China.

For more information about Vermont Law School and the U.S.-China Partnership for Environmental Law, please visit the U.S.-China Partnership for Environmental Law on the web.

To apply, please send a cover letter, curriculum vitae, and references to Diane Hayes, Director of Human Resources, Vermont Law School, P.O. Box 96, South Royalton, VT 05068.  Electronic applications are preferred and can be sent to jobs@vermontlaw.edu.  Applications will be considered as they are submitted.  The position will remain open until filled.

Entergy drills more tritium monitoring wells at Vermont Yankee

Although BP is standing by its claims to fund projects and make payments to victims of the Gulf Oil spill, BP also claims that federal efforts to curb ocean drilling may curb their cash flow making it more difficult to keep its financial promises.  And apparently Gulf drilling is the most lucrative part of BP’s portfolio.  See article here.  So now we have a neverending cycle: drilling caused environmental and economic damage –> need to pay for damage –> need more drilling to pay for damage, which may result in more damage.  Is this always the way for fossil fuel driven projects in America?  We sink money into existing fossil fuel technologies and fossil fuel supporting infrastructure like oil drilling, highways, and cars, and there is less incentive to move to new projects (renewable energy, trains) due to the large amounts already spent on existing infrastructure and technology.  This was certainly the case with the Stimulus Package, which divided money in such as way that the infrastructure of sprawl will persist, and individual energy consumption and the risk of climate change are being hedged against the creation of carbon-free automobile technology that will drive on existing highways, roads and bridges.

Reports the NY Times.

Interesting article in the NY Times about how champagne bottles are being modified in an effort to reduce the carbon foortprint in transit by reducing the weight of the bottle.

“As of Wednesday, Wisconsin’s electronics recycling law bans the use of landfills or incineration to dispose of electronic devices. The ban covers televisions; computers (including desktop, laptop, netbook and tablet computers); computer monitors; desktop printers (including those that scan, fax, or copy); other computer accessories, including keyboards, mice, speakers, external hard drives and flash drives; DVD players, DVRs, VCRs and other video players; Fax machines; and cell phones.”

See here.

So asks this article about the Swedish music scene.  But the same question applies to the Swedish environmental scene, for a country that has proven to be a leader on the issue of climate change, especially in the context of food.

On October 23, 2009, the New York Times ran an article entitled To Cut Global Warming, Swedes Study Their Plates.” This Swedish movement is driven by two major events: (1) the creation of new national dietary guidelines that give equal weight to health and the environment, and (2) the major organic labels in Sweden embarking on a new initiative called “Klimatmärkingning för Mat,” or “Climate Labelling for Food” in English.

For a few weeks next spring I plan to be a Guest Researcher at Uppsala University Faculty of Law in Sweden to lay the groundwork for a comparative project one environmental labeling for food in the United States and Sweden.

(To hear the music click here and here.)

Read here about energy demand and growth in China–and a traffic jam 60 miles long.

« Previous PageNext Page »