China


This evening I attended my local library’s International Series presentation “China in 2025: a Country More Powerful than the USA?” with Loïc Tassé, Political Scientist and Sinologist at the University of Montreal.

Mr. Tassé discussed his views on a simply phrased question: “Will China become a more powerful country than the United States by 2025?”

He suggested that there were three types of superpower status, (1) economic, (2) scientific, and (3) military, and that evidence suggests that China is on pace to meet or surpass the U.S. on all accounts.  In his view, China has become so successful so quickly due to the centralized control of the Communist Party (he views claims of current decentralization as overstated) and the country’s pragmatic management of its economy.  Mr. Tassé suggested three factors that may ultimately limit China’s rise: poor environmental conditions (e.g., polluted water sources), uneven development between the coastal provinces and the more rural interior, and social problems causes by population demographics, specifically so many more men than women.

In Q&A, I think he made a key point (a point that I agree with an explains so much about China’s policies on everything from human rights to climate change)–that most Chinese citizens dislike the rule of the Communist Party and what exists is a tacit agreement where so long as economic prosperity continues, citizens will remain satisfied, but if the economy stalls, the Chinese will start questioning the ruling party.

While in China, I was told (by both Chinese and American professors) that Chinese students expect you to write recommendation letters that they can place in their permanent files.  For most Chinese professors, these letters are relatively standardized, positive, and done as a matter of course without a lot of individualized attention.   I haven’t been asked to write any letters for my former Chinese students who only plan to continue their education in China, but my recommendation has been sought by a significant number of students who want to study in the United States, Cananda, and the UK.  My former Chinese students are surprised to find that most schools (and LSAC) do not anticipate that students will see their letters of recommendation, and are absolutely shocked that I will not send them my letters of recommendation to them for their review.  They insist that I send them the letter for their review, and when I decline the first assumption is that I’m not understanding their request.  I assure them that I understand their request, but that it is best for them to formally waive their rights to review (e.g., on the LSAC form), and that I would have declined to write them a letter if I could not write a positive recommendation.  I’ve very upfront with my Chinese and American students about whether I believe I can write a good letter on their behalf, as well as strategize what key characteristics I should discuss.  But am I being too conservative here?  Should all my students just be able to see my letters first, and then they can decide whether it enhances their file?

Vermont Law School Professor David Mears, in China as a Fulbright Scholar, reflects upon EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson’s visit to China.  He writes,

Yesterday, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson held a town meeting in Huashi Hall, a beautiful, old building on the Sun Yat Sen University campus in Guangzhou, China.  This location happens to be just a few minutes from our apartment, so my wife Nancy and I were able to attend, along with an auditorium full of Chinese students and faculty.  It was a fun experience, surrounded by the students with their obvious interest and excitement in being able to engage with a high-level U.S. official.  Adding to my enjoyment was being able to sit next to my Vermont Law School colleague Professor Tseming Yang who is now a Deputy General Counsel at EPA, and Orestes Anastasia, Vermont Law School Class of 1995 who is the Regional Environment Advisor for USAID in Asia.

The title of Administrator Jackson’s presentation was “30 Years of Cooperation with China.”  It is tempting to launch off this title into a reflection regarding whether enough progress has actually been achieved for the environment in China in the past thirty years sufficient to warrant an anniversary celebration.  It is enough to note simply that, given the state of the environment in China today, whatever has transpired in terms of cooperation between the EPA and Chinese environmental agencies over the past three decades should not serve as the model for addressing China’s environmental issues in the future.

Keep reading at Middle Earth Law.

Reports the Times.  The activities of Liu Xiaobo, and the government response, were a common topic of conversation in closed settings while we were in China.  This news will make the Chinese government very unhappy.

I earlier reviewed the first half of David Plouffe’s retelling of his experience as campaign manager in Obama’s 2008 Presidential Campaign.  I enjoyed the first half immensely, but I can’t say the same for the second.  I think there are two basic reasons for this.  First, the campaign strategy in the general election necessitated by the Electoral College (targeting key states) wasn’t as exciting as the delegate fight of the primary.  It’s true Obama expanded the map in states like North Carolina and Virginia, among others, but that’s really a story of the proper political climate and the money raised by Obama.  Second, again due to the political climate and, at the time, Obama’s unlikely candidacy, Hillary Clinton was a far more formidable opponent than John McCain.   I will say that I expect the 2012 Republican Primary to be almost as exciting as the 2008 Democratic fight, and the 2012 general election could be so entertaining that I could sell tickets to my neighbors without TVs (yes, very common in VT) if they want to watch the debates and election results.

Next on my reading list are Oracle Bones and River Town by Peter Hessler, both books about China, and I’m looking for a good book about the political/presidential history of federal natural resources.  Any sugggestions?

According to this NY Times article, Obama insisted to Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao that China must immediately revalue its currency and if “the Chinese don’t take actions, we have other means of protecting U.S. interests.”

This kind of tone with the Chinese plays great with Americans and domestic politics, and may be effective with China in the long-term.  But in the short-term, it makes the Chinese lose face and the Chinese government may do nothing for fear that they will be perceived as weak in the international community and among their own citizenry.

My view is that this statement by the American President in intended to show Americans that he’s serious about improving the economy, and that it serves as a real warning to the Chinese that Congress might put tariffs on Chinese goods if necessary.

According to this NY Times article, China is dominating the production of green technologies like wind turbines and solar panels for a number of reasons: cheap labor, much needed government support, and violation of  WTO and IMF rules.  The question is whether we should care that the Chinese method in unfair to foreign countries if it is resulting in more affordable green technologies.  Certainly, I have concerns about working conditions and social justice (and the loss of American jobs),  but the Chinese government is much more willing to (and can more easily) invest in green projects in the solar and wind industry and high-speed rail.  Is the problem really Chinese violation of international agreements, or the unwillingness of the U.S. government/Congress/business to promote and require green technologies and forward-thinking infrastructure?

Vermont Law School seeks an individual to join our dynamic and committed faculty, and to serve as the Faculty Director of the Vermont Law School U.S.-China Partnership for Environmental Law.

The Faculty Director will divide his or her time between traditional faculty roles of teaching and scholarship, and the additional role of Faculty Director of the VLS U.S.-China Partnership, a thriving program of U.S.-China environmental law faculty and student exchange, policy assistance, and capacity creation.  The faculty responsibilities include teaching at approximately half load and producing related scholarship.  The U.S.-China Partnership Faculty Directorship involves working with the Program Director to determine directions for the Partnership, establish and maintain relationships with funders and with Chinese partners in government, academia and the non-profit sector.

The Partnership trains Chinese attorneys, judges and scholars in environmental law, brings Chinese environmental law professors and students to Vermont, sends Vermont Law students and faculty to China, and produces collaborations and scholarship among its participants.  The current program personnel include Siu Tip Lam, the Program Director.  Ms. Lam is a former Massachusetts state assistant attorney general in the environmental field with capability in Mandarin and Cantonese.  The program staff includes three other individuals, Chinese nationals with environmental law advanced degrees or training.  As Program Director, Ms. Lam is responsible for developing and implementing the program activities and managing the existing grants and funders.  The Faculty Director will focus on teaching in both Vermont and China and on generating related scholarship, as well as developing relationships with Chinese academics and potential funders of the U.S.-China Partnership.  He/she will work with Ms. Lam and the current staff to further develop the VLS curriculum on Chinese law, build relationships with potential funders, and determine the future direction of the program, including the formulation of strategic partnerships leading to a potential on-the-ground presence in China.

Duties and Responsibilities

Primary responsibilities associated with this position include:

  • Teach two classes most years (including a core course, U.S. and/or Chinese environmental law courses or international law course).
  • Research and produce academic publications.
  • Represent the U.S.-China Partnership in the development of relationships with Chinese academics and potential funders.
  • Develop strategic partnerships to explore possibility of building an on-the-ground presence in China.
  • Help guide and supervise research by students and/or scholars.

Education, Skills and Experience

This position requires significant experience with environmental issues as well as the desire and temperament to be a good mentor for the development of new professionals in the field.  Successful candidates should possess a record of professional productivity such as academic publications and the following qualifications:

  • JD degree
  • Knowledge of Chinese and American law
  • Knowledge of broad environmental and energy law issues in China and the U.S.
  • Knowledge of international law
  • Proficiency in Mandarin Chinese and/or Cantonese highly preferred
  • Achievement in research, writing, or scholarship
  • Some fundraising experience
  • Excellent interpersonal, verbal communication and writing skills, as well as the ability to develop effective multi-agency/institutional relationships
  • Interest and willingness to regularly travel to China.

For more information about Vermont Law School and the U.S.-China Partnership for Environmental Law, please visit the U.S.-China Partnership for Environmental Law on the web.

To apply, please send a cover letter, curriculum vitae, and references to Diane Hayes, Director of Human Resources, Vermont Law School, P.O. Box 96, South Royalton, VT 05068.  Electronic applications are preferred and can be sent to jobs@vermontlaw.edu.  Applications will be considered as they are submitted.  The position will remain open until filled.

Read here about energy demand and growth in China–and a traffic jam 60 miles long.

Today begins Vermont Law School Orientation for new first-year students, and faculty are introduced and mingle with the students.  Admittedly, after a year in China, I’m finding it all a bit overwhelming.  In China, despite the 14.5 million people in Guangzhou, I was a cultural outsider, did not speak the language fluently, and, thus, could and was often expected to be quiet and on the sidelines.  Today, during our opening convocation, I was in a room with more English speakers than I have experienced in a year, and students and faculty alike sought me out to say hello and ask me about my travels.  I’m enjoying be back and everyone’s kindness, but a little reverse culture shock is setting in.

« Previous PageNext Page »