Reports Political Wire: Senate Democrats said they “had abandoned hope of passing a comprehensive energy bill this summer and would pursue a more limited measure focused primarily on responding the Gulf oil spill and including some tightening of energy efficiency standards,” the New York Times reports. Explained Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: “We don’t have a single Republican to work with us.
The question I have is whether this is a good or bad thing. Absent Congressional legislation, pursuant to the Supreme Court case of Mass. v. EPA, and in light of the EPA’s “endangerment finding” under the Clean Air Act that identifies greenhouses gases as an air pollutant, EPA regulation of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act could, if the Obama administration chooses to push it, be far more environmentally successful than any climate change legislation that passes Congress. But how far is Obama willing to go?
August 20, 2010 at 9:10 AM
[…] strategically in order to pressure Congress to pass climate change legislation. But again, as I posted before, are we better off without new legialstion and instead having the EPA regulate greenhouse gases […]
August 26, 2010 at 3:00 PM
[…] the government’s brief in AEP v. Conn., arguing that common law claims are not available, and no hope of passing climate legislation in Congress, this seems to be the path. Greenwire’s two topic articles today sum the story up best with […]